was real, and it came up with a 2005 National Geographic
documentary on the supernatural. After watching all five
portions of the episode, I got to this comment:
"I thought it would be pretty cool to believe in something like that
but I guess their [sic] full of crap"
Nicely put. Lately I have been Jonesing for info by skeptics
and cultbusters... perhaps because I really want to cut to
the non-mystical chase in my own "philosophical" work.
After maybe half a decade being interested in e.g. "magick",
(but with zero interest or belief in in "the supernatural") I
feel that somehow the "push" should be coming to "shove".
Not quite sure what that means, but I certainly would
prefer it if I wasn't walking around disappointed in something
that never existed in the first place. It seems to me that,
for example, there is a huge difference between stuff like
"binding" of mind and body, and woo-woo stuff like prana...
FWIW
0 comments:
Post a Comment